Create accountLogin

Recent searches

No recent searches

Search options

Only available when logged in.
ecoevo.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Dedicated to Ecology and Evolution. We welcome academics, students, industry scientists, folks from other fields with links to E&E, scientific societies, and nature enthusiasts in general.

Administered by:

Server stats:

557
active users

ecoevo.social: AboutProfiles directoryPrivacy policy

Mastodon: AboutGet the appKeyboard shortcutsView source codev4.3.8

Public
Megan Lynch (she/her)

I decided to look up mentions of Davisville (what Davis used to be called).

Screenshot of the Chico Record, April 7, 1906 "DAVISVILLE GETS THE STATE FARM SACRAMENTO. April «.—The Sacramento Valley scored a great triumph when shortly before midnight last night the University Farm Commission voted unanimously to purchase the Davisville Tract offered by the Chamber of Commerce of Davisville, Yolo County, for a State Farm. This action was taken after three hours’ deliberation In executive session, all the members being In attendance. They were Governor Pardee, Lieutenant-Governor Alden Anderson, Benjamin Ide Wheeler, President of the State University* El wood Cooper, State Horticultural Commissioner; Senator B. F. Rush. President of the State Agricultural Society. Yolo County’s victory was notable by reason of the fact that the Davisvillle tract was chosen over seventy different sites In twelve counties which had been offered the State through the Commission. The tract selected embraces 778 acres of rich loam soil adjoining Davisville, and the price to be paid is $104,350."
Public *
Megan Lynch (she/her)

Due to the research I've done on carob's CA history, I'm a little familiar with the wrangling that happened over where UC campuses would be located. However, it was in regard to another campus.

This is my introduction to what was involved in "The University Farm" selection.

cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=MCS1906112

Detail of an article from the Merced County Sun, 1906. "Alexander Gordon, one of the best I informed men on land values and soil adaptability in California, is convinced that the state made a bad mistake in selecting the Davisville site for the ■tata term. Mr. Gordon saja that the ; error will be more in evidence after j the farm is in full operation. In his ; opinion the practical results expected from the enterprise, and which were in the minds of the promoters of the proposition in the legislature, will fail of realization, as the public will find out before many years. Mr. Gordon thinks that, as far as useful results go, the $135,000 paid for the Davisville site might as well have been turned into a bottomless sewer. “The Davisville tract,” says Mr. Gordon, “is a piece of the richest land in the state. Anything that will grow in California in the richest ground will thrive there. That is the defect in the selection. What the state owes to its citizens who may desire to choose agriculture for their occupation, is not to show them how to grow things on land that will grow everything luxuriantly, but to show them how to get results out of poor soils. "
#DavisCA#UCDavis
Public *
Megan Lynch (she/her)

I could easily spend all day reading vintage newspapers, particularly the reader letters to the Pacific Rural Press.

I love agricultural/horticultural history.

#histodons#DavisCA#California
Public
Martin Stoermer

@ml there
was a big stink here because the previous government hadn’t renewed funding for the federal library’s digitised newspaper collection Trove. Historians and genealogists lobbied hard and got it reversed. So glad because it’s a goldmine

ExploreLive feeds
About