William Perry<p>Check out our newest paper on <a href="https://fishsci.com/tags/wastewater" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>wastewater</span></a> sample storage best practice, published in Journal of Virological Methods: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2024.115063" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.202</span><span class="invisible">4.115063</span></a><br>What was really eye opening for me is that storing samples at 4C was often the best option for chemical and RNA markers, especially if it was for <30 weeks. <br>I also enjoyed exploring what switching from -80C to 4, or even -20, would do for CO2 saving, because -80 freezers are real energy guzzlers! <a href="https://fishsci.com/tags/SARSCoV2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SARSCoV2</span></a> <a href="https://fishsci.com/tags/WBE" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>WBE</span></a> <a href="https://fishsci.com/tags/SampleStorage" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SampleStorage</span></a> <a href="https://fishsci.com/tags/ClimateChange" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ClimateChange</span></a></p>